An Argument for Inclusion
Monday, October 27, 2008 at 10:01AM 
Some years ago my studio teacher showed me an online forum of art teachers where one person was expressing her annoyance at having to teach Kindergarten students, which she felt was “a waste of my time”. Other teachers chimed in with sympathy and understanding.
Now that doesn’t represent all art teachers, of course; my friend was indignant and said she wished these men and women could visit her studio and see the work produced by three- and four-year-olds. They were expressive, creative, and meaningful — actually, much more so than the typical cookie-cutter art produced by older children at many schools.
Yesterday I mused about the blog posts I’ve read recently about “distracting” little children when their older siblings are busy learning. Many adults, both at home and in school, seem to think that investing time helping the youngest learners is time better spent elsewhere.
Another post for another day, but I get tired of hearing “children’s work is play” used as an excuse to put small children in the corner with a box of blocks. Children’s work is play, but that doesn’t make it any less meaningful or less worthy of attention and support. They learn through play; they express what they know through play. That isn’t to say that it isn’t also their work.
Why should small children be wooed away from older children who are hard at work?
The child who is digging in the dirt with a stick at the edge of the group will swiftly (as we mothers know) turn into a child who has the ability to participate fully. You can take advantage of exposing her to the type of work you hope she will do, or you can try to distract her away from it to make more room for the older children.
In doing so, you do a disservice to both groups. The younger children are losing the chance to learn in the easiest, most pleasant way — at the feet of their loved ones. The older ones are losing their chance to display their mastery to an adoring audience. In a mixed group of children, both groups benefit.
If you are teaching a traditional curriculum, dedicating a portion of your schedule to project-based learning will allow your children to not only acquire basic skills but learn to apply them, acquiring valuable habits of mind along the way. Letting your youngest children marinate in this atmosphere of engaged, excited learning is the best way to effortlessly raise relentless learners.
If you are unschooling, introducing preschool-age children to project work means that by age five or six you will have what I call a project-oriented child — an avid learner who reaches confidently for resources (including adults) to learn about what excites his interest.




Reader Comments (23)
I'm really interested in your thoughts on the little ones.
re: your 22mo, i hear you! it would be great if we could live in layers so that the 5yo could have legos and glitter that never reached the 22mo layer... or maybe alternate dimensions...
you have your hands full, for sure. i don't mean to downplay how hard it is, only highlight that young children can also get hooked on projects. my sons are three years apart and i well remember when the older was 4 and the younger was 1 and right in the center of the action. :^)
sally, yay! let's do the wave again. ;^)
My kids are 2 and 5 years. They love, love art. We have the art supplies out with in reach at all times. They have their own little space at each end of the table and love to hold things up to show the other. This also makes it easy for me to keep their supplies seperate if my older daughter is working with things that are not appropriate for her little brother. We have two containers full of all the things they use most often so they can each have some at "their" end. They are great at asking for different colors, etc. that the other has. It is just such a wonderful part of our life. I can't imagine my house without the amazing art of both of my children. My 2 yr old points out his art around the house. "I draw that", I paint that." He is so proud to see his work up along side grandma's paintings and mom's photos. Include the little ones? No question about it! Without a doubt worth any extra effort!
cate, absolutely. :^)
jeannine, i love the way you phrased that - each girl (and each age) having their own world. so true. and then they come together and make another, shared world. :^)
molly, the pictures of elizabeth getting into the act are so great. :^)
karen, thank you for visiting me! and i agree - the earlier, the better. :^)
Thanks for your comment on my blog, how did you find me? I'm glad you did as I plan to homeschool my little ones and your website looks very interesting, I'm sure I will be visiting here often.
What I said: “I get tired of hearing “children’s work is play” used as an excuse to put small children in the corner with a box of blocks. Children’s work is play, but that doesn’t make it any less meaningful or less worthy of attention and support. They learn through play; they express what they know through play. That isn’t to say that it isn’t also their work.”
I don’t have any quibble with the phrase, just the way some people seem to apply it — as an excuse for distracting small children with playthings and giving attention to the intellectual pursuits of older children. Rather, I see play as the way that small children learn and articulate their questions and what they know — so, rich play experiences that are really meaningful to the child are my goal.
Hope I did a better job expressing myself this time. :^)
Thanks again for your thought provoking post :o)
~simply stork~